SOC model questions, asked often

An AI SOC analyst platform, a SOAR playbook engine, an MDR service and a SIEM copilot. They differ in who carries triage, investigation, response and the night shift. See the decision guide.

Usually an AI SOC analyst platform if the team can own decisions, or MDR if it cannot cover nights. The fit finder shows how your answers move the order.

Yes, and many do: SOAR for fixed responses with agents for the rest, or an AI SOC platform by day with a provider at night. See running a split model.

Alerts per day, the share closed unread, time per investigated alert, alerts outside working hours and playbook coverage. See measuring your queue.

It weighs heavily, because every model needs someone to own decisions. With no analysts, software alone leaves nobody to approve actions, which is why the fit finder gives MDR its maximum for that answer.

Which of our alert sources are supported today, by name. A product that cannot read your noisiest source will not shorten your queue.

It picks up alerts, investigates each one across connected tools and reaches a verdict with evidence. Some products also act within limits you set. See the model page.

Some do. Among the profiled vendors, Mate Security, 7AI, Artemis Security, Conifers CognitiveSOC, Exaforce, Intezer, Prophet Security and Torq AI SOC Platform document running actions; Dropzone AI and Vega hand response to a connected SOAR or to your analysts.

Approaches differ. Mate Security describes translating playbooks; 7AI, Dropzone AI, Intezer and Vega work beside the SOAR you keep.

Decide action by action, not in general. A response action catalog lists each action with its blast radius and approval level.

None of the thirteen profiled vendors publishes a list price for a paid edition on its own site. Dropzone AI, Intezer and Tines publish tiers or a pricing unit.

Yes, for fixed, audited responses and where playbooks work. The SOAR model page covers when it strains.

Yes. Palo Alto describes Cortex AgentiX as the next generation of Cortex XSOAR, with AI prompts inside playbooks. Splunk says SOAR is now native in Splunk Enterprise Security, which it describes as integrated with agentic AI.

Among the profiled vendors, Cortex XSOAR publishes the largest figure: 900+ prebuilt integrations and automation packs. Splunk SOAR publishes 300+ tools and 2,800+ actions.

Cortex XSOAR has an XSOAR 8 On-prem edition, with an end of life of 30 September 2029 per Palo Alto documentation, and Splunk SOAR runs in the cloud, on-premises or hybrid.

Analysts and hours from a provider, under a contract that sets which actions they may take. See what MDR buys.

If your team reads every alert the same day and wants speed per alert, it can be. It does not read the alerts nobody opens. See copilot or agent.

7AI, Artemis Security, Exaforce and Prophet Security, as options alongside their software.

Yes, with lighter profiles: Arctic Wolf Aurora MDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Complete, Daylight Security, Expel MDR, Zscaler MDR (formerly Red Canary), CrowdStrike Charlotte AI, Google Security Operations with Gemini and Microsoft Security Copilot. They are not in the fact table or fit finder vendor list, which compare the thirteen AI SOC and SOAR products on the same capabilities.

Mate Security, 7AI, Artemis Security, Conifers CognitiveSOC, Cortex XSOAR, Dropzone AI, Exaforce, Intezer, Prophet Security, Splunk SOAR, Tines, Torq AI SOC Platform and Vega. See all profiles.

Single-tenant: Dropzone AI and Prophet Security. On-premises, hybrid or your own cloud tenant: Conifers CognitiveSOC, Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR and Tines.

Conifers CognitiveSOC and Dropzone AI, on the pages reviewed.

Because the right model and vendor depend on your team. We record facts and let the fit finder order them from your answers. See how we profile.

Use the contact page with the topic Correction and a link to the vendor's page. We check it against the source and update the data.