Side by side
Torq AI SOC Platform vs Vega: facts side by side
The short answer
By The Triage Desk · AI Cyber Compare · Published 2026-10-08
Desk research from public vendor pages: vendor facts read September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial reading of what vendors publish; we did not run the products and did not interview vendors.
How do Torq and Vega differ at a glance?
| Fact | Torq | Vega |
|---|---|---|
| Primary model | AI SOC analyst | AI SOC analyst |
| Also reaches into | SOAR | SIEM copilot |
| Position on SOAR | Replaces SOAR | Works beside SOAR |
| Integrations | 300 pre-built integrations and 4,000+ pre-built steps, plus AI-generated integrations. | Not published |
| Deployment | Described as cloud-native. Other options: not described on the pages reviewed. | Runs on Vega's Security Analytics Mesh against data where it lives; Vega says no migration, ingestion or egress. Tenancy and residency: not described. |
| Pricing | Not published | Not published |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, ISO 42001:2023 and German BSI C5 (the last two announced 5 December 2025). | Not reviewed |
| Funding | $70M Series C (September 2024); $140M Series D at a $1.2B valuation (January 2026). Acquired Jit (May 2026). | Backed by Cyberstarts, Accel, Redpoint and CRV (founded 2024). |
Who carries each stage?
Torq AI SOC Platform
Vega
- Your analysts
- Rules you write
- AI agent
- Provider's analysts
- Shared
- Not described
Stages where they differ:
- Respond: Torq shared, Vega your analysts
Which capabilities does each document?
| Capability | Torq | Vega | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Runs response actions itself | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Can act alone on some cases | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Integration count published | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Approval or sign-off before actions | Not described | Not described | |
| Translates existing SOAR playbooks | Not described | Not described | |
| Optional service where the vendor's people work the queue | Not described | Not described | |
| Multi-tenant or MSSP offering | Not described | Not described | |
| On-premises, hybrid or your own cloud tenant | Not described | Not described | |
| Single-tenant option | Not described | Not described | |
| Data residency option | Not described | Not described | |
| Pricing unit or tiers published | Not described | Not described |
What are the strengths and limits of each?
Torq
Strengths
- The largest published integration catalog among the AI SOC platforms here, with deterministic and agentic workflows in one engine.
- Heavily funded, with a steady 2026 release record (Agentic Builder, Jit, SOC Brain).
Limits
- Existing SOAR playbooks are rebuilt in Torq rather than translated; plan the rebuild effort.
- No public pricing, and deployment beyond cloud-native is not described.
Vega
Strengths
- Each verdict shows the query behind it.
- Hunting, detection-as-code and triage on data left where it lives.
Limits
- Executing response is not described; analysts or other tools act.
- No connector count and no public pricing.
When would you choose Torq, and when Vega?
Choose Torq if you need:
- running response actions itself
- acting alone on some cases
- a published integration count
- The largest published integration catalog among the AI SOC platforms here, with deterministic and agentic workflows in one engine.
Choose Vega if you need:
- Each verdict shows the query behind it.
- Hunting, detection-as-code and triage on data left where it lives.
What does each vendor say about its own results?
Torq
Vega
Asked often about this page
Which is better, Torq or Vega?
We do not rank vendors. Torq documents running response actions itself and Vega documents each verdict shows the query behind it. The fit finder orders vendors by the needs your answers imply.
Do Torq and Vega publish pricing?
Neither publishes pricing on its own site.
Can Torq and Vega be used together?
Our sources do not describe an integration between Torq and Vega. Ask both vendors before planning to run them together.