Side by side
Tines vs Torq AI SOC Platform: facts side by side
The short answer
Tines is a SOAR product and Torq is an AI SOC analyst product. Both replace SOAR. Tines documents approval or sign-off before actions, on-premises, hybrid or customer-tenant hosting and a published pricing unit or tiers; Torq documents a published integration count. We do not name a winner: which fits depends on your team, and the fit finder can order them by your answers.
By The Triage Desk · AI Cyber Compare · Published 2026-10-08
Desk research from public vendor pages: vendor facts read September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial reading of what vendors publish; we did not run the products and did not interview vendors.
How do Tines and Torq differ at a glance?
| Fact | Tines | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Primary model | SOAR | AI SOC analyst |
| Also reaches into | AI SOC analyst | SOAR |
| Position on SOAR | Replaces SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | Not published | 300 pre-built integrations and 4,000+ pre-built steps, plus AI-generated integrations. |
| Deployment | Shared stack, self-hosted or hybrid; Tines says AI features are available wherever Tines is deployed. | Described as cloud-native. Other options: not described on the pages reviewed. |
| Pricing | Free edition: unlimited users and connectors, 3 live workflows, one-time $50 AI allowance. Paid editions: contact sales; startup program discounts. | Not published |
| Compliance | Not reviewed | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, ISO 42001:2023 and German BSI C5 (the last two announced 5 December 2025). |
| Funding | $125M Series C at a $1.125B valuation, announced 11 February 2025. | $70M Series C (September 2024); $140M Series D at a $1.2B valuation (January 2026). Acquired Jit (May 2026). |
Who carries each stage?
Tines
Torq AI SOC Platform
- Your analysts
- Rules you write
- AI agent
- Provider's analysts
- Shared
- Not described
Stages where they differ:
- Investigate: Tines shared, Torq AI agent
- Tune: Tines your analysts, Torq shared
Which capabilities does each document?
| Capability | Tines | Torq | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approval or sign-off before actions | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| On-premises, hybrid or your own cloud tenant | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Integration count published | Not described | Documented | Differs |
| Pricing unit or tiers published | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Runs response actions itself | Documented | Documented | |
| Can act alone on some cases | Documented | Documented | |
| Translates existing SOAR playbooks | Not described | Not described | |
| Optional service where the vendor's people work the queue | Not described | Not described | |
| Multi-tenant or MSSP offering | Not described | Not described | |
| Single-tenant option | Not described | Not described | |
| Data residency option | Not described | Not described |
What are the strengths and limits of each?
Tines
Strengths
- Self-hosted and hybrid deployment, with AI available wherever Tines runs.
- A free edition with published limits, so a team can build before talking to sales.
Limits
- No prebuilt AI SOC analyst is described; your team designs the investigation logic.
- No integration count, and paid editions have no public price.
Torq
Strengths
- The largest published integration catalog among the AI SOC platforms here, with deterministic and agentic workflows in one engine.
- Heavily funded, with a steady 2026 release record (Agentic Builder, Jit, SOC Brain).
Limits
- Existing SOAR playbooks are rebuilt in Torq rather than translated; plan the rebuild effort.
- No public pricing, and deployment beyond cloud-native is not described.
When would you choose Tines, and when Torq?
Choose Tines if you need:
- approval or sign-off before actions
- on-premises, hybrid or customer-tenant hosting
- a published pricing unit or tiers
- Self-hosted and hybrid deployment, with AI available wherever Tines runs.
Choose Torq if you need:
- a published integration count
- The largest published integration catalog among the AI SOC platforms here, with deterministic and agentic workflows in one engine.
What does each vendor say about its own results?
Tines
No vendor figures were collected for Tines.
Torq
Asked often about this page
Which is better, Tines or Torq?
We do not rank vendors. Tines documents approval or sign-off before actions and Torq documents a published integration count. The fit finder orders vendors by the needs your answers imply.
Do Tines and Torq publish pricing?
Tines publishes tiers or a pricing unit; Torq does not publish pricing on its own site. Neither publishes a paid list price there.
Can Tines and Torq be used together?
Our sources do not describe an integration between Tines and Torq. Ask both vendors before planning to run them together.
Read next
Fit finderOrder vendors by the needs your answers imply.Which modelThe decision guide for all four models.Tines profileA workflow platform for AI agents, apps and automation that positions itself as a modern SOAR, with an AI SOC use case built from workflows.Torq profileAgentic AI on top of Hyperautomation: AI agents for triage and investigation plus a no-code automation engine.