Side by side
Prophet Security vs Vega: facts side by side
The short answer
By The Triage Desk · AI Cyber Compare · Published 2026-10-08
Desk research from public vendor pages: vendor facts read September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial reading of what vendors publish; we did not run the products and did not interview vendors.
How do Prophet and Vega differ at a glance?
| Fact | Prophet | Vega |
|---|---|---|
| Primary model | AI SOC analyst | AI SOC analyst |
| Also reaches into | MDR | SIEM copilot |
| Position on SOAR | Replaces SOAR | Works beside SOAR |
| Integrations | 200+ out of the box. | Not published |
| Deployment | Single-tenant; customer data in individual datastores; bring-your-own-key option; runs on AWS. On-premises: not described. | Runs on Vega's Security Analytics Mesh against data where it lives; Vega says no migration, ingestion or egress. Tenancy and residency: not described. |
| Pricing | Not published | Not published |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II (report on request) | Not reviewed |
| Funding | Not in our sources | Backed by Cyberstarts, Accel, Redpoint and CRV (founded 2024). |
Who carries each stage?
Prophet Security
Vega
- Your analysts
- Rules you write
- AI agent
- Provider's analysts
- Shared
- Not described
Stages where they differ:
- Respond: Prophet shared, Vega your analysts
- Nights and weekends: Prophet provider's analysts, Vega not described
Which capabilities does each document?
| Capability | Prophet | Vega | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Runs response actions itself | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Approval or sign-off before actions | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Can act alone on some cases | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Optional service where the vendor's people work the queue | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Single-tenant option | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Integration count published | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Translates existing SOAR playbooks | Not described | Not described | |
| Multi-tenant or MSSP offering | Not described | Not described | |
| On-premises, hybrid or your own cloud tenant | Not described | Not described | |
| Data residency option | Not described | Not described | |
| Pricing unit or tiers published | Not described | Not described |
What are the strengths and limits of each?
Prophet
Strengths
- Native, scoped response with a sign-off option, so response does not depend on a SOAR.
- An optional human service for teams without 24x7 staff, plus single-tenant hosting with BYOK.
Limits
- Pricing is not published.
- No path for translating existing SOAR playbooks is described, and hosting is AWS only on the pages reviewed.
Vega
Strengths
- Each verdict shows the query behind it.
- Hunting, detection-as-code and triage on data left where it lives.
Limits
- Executing response is not described; analysts or other tools act.
- No connector count and no public pricing.
When would you choose Prophet, and when Vega?
Choose Prophet if you need:
- running response actions itself
- approval or sign-off before actions
- acting alone on some cases
- Native, scoped response with a sign-off option, so response does not depend on a SOAR.
Choose Vega if you need:
- Each verdict shows the query behind it.
- Hunting, detection-as-code and triage on data left where it lives.
What does each vendor say about its own results?
Prophet
No vendor figures were collected for Prophet.
Vega
Asked often about this page
Which is better, Prophet or Vega?
We do not rank vendors. Prophet documents running response actions itself and Vega documents each verdict shows the query behind it. The fit finder orders vendors by the needs your answers imply.
Do Prophet and Vega publish pricing?
Neither publishes pricing on its own site.
Can Prophet and Vega be used together?
Our sources do not describe an integration between Prophet and Vega. Ask both vendors before planning to run them together.