Skip to content
AI Cyber Compare

Side by side

Prophet Security vs Tines: facts side by side

The short answer

Prophet is an AI SOC analyst product and Tines is a SOAR product. Both replace SOAR. Prophet documents an optional service where its own people work the queue, a single-tenant option and a published integration count; Tines documents on-premises, hybrid or customer-tenant hosting and a published pricing unit or tiers. We do not name a winner: which fits depends on your team, and the fit finder can order them by your answers.

By The Triage Desk · AI Cyber Compare · Published 2026-10-08

Desk research from public vendor pages: vendor facts read September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial reading of what vendors publish; we did not run the products and did not interview vendors.

How do Prophet and Tines differ at a glance?

FactProphetTines
Primary modelAI SOC analystSOAR
Also reaches intoMDRAI SOC analyst
Position on SOARReplaces SOARReplaces SOAR
Integrations200+ out of the box.Not published
DeploymentSingle-tenant; customer data in individual datastores; bring-your-own-key option; runs on AWS. On-premises: not described.Shared stack, self-hosted or hybrid; Tines says AI features are available wherever Tines is deployed.
PricingNot publishedFree edition: unlimited users and connectors, 3 live workflows, one-time $50 AI allowance. Paid editions: contact sales; startup program discounts.
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II (report on request)Not reviewed
FundingNot in our sources$125M Series C at a $1.125B valuation, announced 11 February 2025.

Who carries each stage?

Prophet Security

Work strip for Prophet Security: Triage, AI agent; Investigate, AI agent; Respond, shared; Tune, shared; Nights and weekends, provider's analysts.TriageAI agentInvestigateAI agentRespondSharedTuneSharedNights and weekendsProvider's analysts

Tines

Work strip for Tines: Triage, AI agent; Investigate, shared; Respond, shared; Tune, your analysts; Nights and weekends, not described.TriageAI agentInvestigateSharedRespondSharedTuneYour analystsNights and weekendsNot described
  • Your analysts
  • Rules you write
  • AI agent
  • Provider's analysts
  • Shared
  • Not described

Stages where they differ:

  • Investigate: Prophet AI agent, Tines shared
  • Tune: Prophet shared, Tines your analysts
  • Nights and weekends: Prophet provider's analysts, Tines not described

Which capabilities does each document?

CapabilityProphetTinesDifference
Optional service where the vendor's people work the queueDocumentedNot describedDiffers
On-premises, hybrid or your own cloud tenantNot describedDocumentedDiffers
Single-tenant optionDocumentedNot describedDiffers
Integration count publishedDocumentedNot describedDiffers
Pricing unit or tiers publishedNot describedDocumentedDiffers
Runs response actions itselfDocumentedDocumented
Approval or sign-off before actionsDocumentedDocumented
Can act alone on some casesDocumentedDocumented
Translates existing SOAR playbooksNot describedNot described
Multi-tenant or MSSP offeringNot describedNot described
Data residency optionNot describedNot described

What are the strengths and limits of each?

Prophet

Strengths

  • Native, scoped response with a sign-off option, so response does not depend on a SOAR.
  • An optional human service for teams without 24x7 staff, plus single-tenant hosting with BYOK.

Limits

  • Pricing is not published.
  • No path for translating existing SOAR playbooks is described, and hosting is AWS only on the pages reviewed.

Tines

Strengths

  • Self-hosted and hybrid deployment, with AI available wherever Tines runs.
  • A free edition with published limits, so a team can build before talking to sales.

Limits

  • No prebuilt AI SOC analyst is described; your team designs the investigation logic.
  • No integration count, and paid editions have no public price.

When would you choose Prophet, and when Tines?

Choose Prophet if you need:

  • an optional service where its own people work the queue
  • a single-tenant option
  • a published integration count
  • Native, scoped response with a sign-off option, so response does not depend on a SOAR.

Choose Tines if you need:

  • on-premises, hybrid or customer-tenant hosting
  • a published pricing unit or tiers
  • Self-hosted and hybrid deployment, with AI available wherever Tines runs.

What does each vendor say about its own results?

Prophet

No vendor figures were collected for Prophet.

Tines

No vendor figures were collected for Tines.

Asked often about this page

Which is better, Prophet or Tines?

We do not rank vendors. Prophet documents an optional service where its own people work the queue and Tines documents on-premises, hybrid or customer-tenant hosting. The fit finder orders vendors by the needs your answers imply.

Do Prophet and Tines publish pricing?

Tines publishes tiers or a pricing unit; Prophet does not publish pricing on its own site. Neither publishes a paid list price there.

Can Prophet and Tines be used together?

Our sources do not describe an integration between Prophet and Tines. Ask both vendors before planning to run them together.

Read next

Fit finderOrder vendors by the needs your answers imply.Which modelThe decision guide for all four models.Prophet profileAn AI SOC analyst with scoped response actions and an optional 24x7 human review service.Tines profileA workflow platform for AI agents, apps and automation that positions itself as a modern SOAR, with an AI SOC use case built from workflows.