Side by side
Intezer vs Tines: facts side by side
The short answer
By The Triage Desk · AI Cyber Compare · Published 2026-10-08
Desk research from public vendor pages: vendor facts read September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial reading of what vendors publish; we did not run the products and did not interview vendors.
How do Intezer and Tines differ at a glance?
| Fact | Intezer | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Primary model | AI SOC analyst | SOAR |
| Also reaches into | None | AI SOC analyst |
| Position on SOAR | Works beside SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | 100+ | Not published |
| Deployment | Not published | Shared stack, self-hosted or hybrid; Tines says AI features are available wherever Tines is deployed. |
| Pricing | Two tiers: Starter (one alert source) and Complete (all alert sources), both priced by endpoints with no volume fees. Prices: contact sales. | Free edition: unlimited users and connectors, 3 live workflows, one-time $50 AI allowance. Paid editions: contact sales; startup program discounts. |
| Compliance | Not reviewed | Not reviewed |
| Funding | Not in our sources | $125M Series C at a $1.125B valuation, announced 11 February 2025. |
Who carries each stage?
Intezer
Tines
- Your analysts
- Rules you write
- AI agent
- Provider's analysts
- Shared
- Not described
Stages where they differ:
- Investigate: Intezer AI agent, Tines shared
- Tune: Intezer not described, Tines your analysts
Which capabilities does each document?
| Capability | Intezer | Tines | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approval or sign-off before actions | Not described | Documented | Differs |
| On-premises, hybrid or your own cloud tenant | Not described | Documented | Differs |
| Integration count published | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Runs response actions itself | Documented | Documented | |
| Can act alone on some cases | Documented | Documented | |
| Translates existing SOAR playbooks | Not described | Not described | |
| Optional service where the vendor's people work the queue | Not described | Not described | |
| Multi-tenant or MSSP offering | Not described | Not described | |
| Single-tenant option | Not described | Not described | |
| Data residency option | Not described | Not described | |
| Pricing unit or tiers published | Documented | Documented |
What are the strengths and limits of each?
Intezer
Strengths
- Forensic techniques, memory scanning and reverse engineering, that most vendors here do not describe.
- A published pricing unit that does not grow with alert volume.
Limits
- Built to feed SOAR and ticketing rather than replace playbooks.
- Deployment options are not published.
Tines
Strengths
- Self-hosted and hybrid deployment, with AI available wherever Tines runs.
- A free edition with published limits, so a team can build before talking to sales.
Limits
- No prebuilt AI SOC analyst is described; your team designs the investigation logic.
- No integration count, and paid editions have no public price.
When would you choose Intezer, and when Tines?
Choose Intezer if you need:
- a published integration count
- Forensic techniques, memory scanning and reverse engineering, that most vendors here do not describe.
Choose Tines if you need:
- approval or sign-off before actions
- on-premises, hybrid or customer-tenant hosting
- Self-hosted and hybrid deployment, with AI available wherever Tines runs.
What does each vendor say about its own results?
Intezer
Tines
No vendor figures were collected for Tines.
Asked often about this page
Which is better, Intezer or Tines?
We do not rank vendors. Intezer documents a published integration count and Tines documents approval or sign-off before actions. The fit finder orders vendors by the needs your answers imply.
Do Intezer and Tines publish pricing?
Both publish tiers or a pricing unit, but neither publishes a paid list price on its own site.
Can Intezer and Tines be used together?
Our sources do not describe an integration between Intezer and Tines. Ask both vendors before planning to run them together.