Side by side
Exaforce vs Prophet Security: facts side by side
The short answer
By The Triage Desk · AI Cyber Compare · Published 2026-10-08
Desk research from public vendor pages: vendor facts read September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial reading of what vendors publish; we did not run the products and did not interview vendors.
How do Exaforce and Prophet differ at a glance?
| Fact | Exaforce | Prophet |
|---|---|---|
| Primary model | AI SOC analyst | AI SOC analyst |
| Also reaches into | MDR | MDR |
| Position on SOAR | Replaces SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | 130+ across IaaS, SaaS, identity, endpoint, SIEM, SOAR, email, ticketing, threat intel and AI. | 200+ out of the box. |
| Deployment | Not published | Single-tenant; customer data in individual datastores; bring-your-own-key option; runs on AWS. On-premises: not described. |
| Pricing | Not published | Not published |
| Compliance | Not reviewed | SOC 2 Type II (report on request) |
| Funding | $75M Series A (April 2025) and $125M Series B (May 2026), per Exaforce's newsroom. | Not in our sources |
Who carries each stage?
Exaforce
Prophet Security
- Your analysts
- Rules you write
- AI agent
- Provider's analysts
- Shared
- Not described
Stages where they differ:
- Tune: Exaforce not described, Prophet shared
Which capabilities does each document?
| Capability | Exaforce | Prophet | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-tenant option | Not described | Documented | Differs |
| Runs response actions itself | Documented | Documented | |
| Approval or sign-off before actions | Documented | Documented | |
| Can act alone on some cases | Documented | Documented | |
| Translates existing SOAR playbooks | Not described | Not described | |
| Optional service where the vendor's people work the queue | Documented | Documented | |
| Multi-tenant or MSSP offering | Not described | Not described | |
| On-premises, hybrid or your own cloud tenant | Not described | Not described | |
| Data residency option | Not described | Not described | |
| Integration count published | Documented | Documented | |
| Pricing unit or tiers published | Not described | Not described |
What are the strengths and limits of each?
Exaforce
Strengths
- Native response across endpoint, identity, cloud, SaaS and email, behind approval gates.
- A choice of running it yourself or having Exaforce run it, on the same platform.
Limits
- Deployment, tenancy and residency options are not described on the pages reviewed.
- The only public price is a marketplace starter pack whose unit is not defined.
Prophet
Strengths
- Native, scoped response with a sign-off option, so response does not depend on a SOAR.
- An optional human service for teams without 24x7 staff, plus single-tenant hosting with BYOK.
Limits
- Pricing is not published.
- No path for translating existing SOAR playbooks is described, and hosting is AWS only on the pages reviewed.
When would you choose Exaforce, and when Prophet?
Choose Exaforce if you need:
- Native response across endpoint, identity, cloud, SaaS and email, behind approval gates.
- A choice of running it yourself or having Exaforce run it, on the same platform.
Choose Prophet if you need:
- a single-tenant option
- Native, scoped response with a sign-off option, so response does not depend on a SOAR.
What does each vendor say about its own results?
Exaforce
Prophet
No vendor figures were collected for Prophet.
Asked often about this page
Which is better, Exaforce or Prophet?
We do not rank vendors. Exaforce documents native response across endpoint, identity, cloud, SaaS and email, behind approval gates and Prophet documents a single-tenant option. The fit finder orders vendors by the needs your answers imply.
Do Exaforce and Prophet publish pricing?
Neither publishes pricing on its own site.
Can Exaforce and Prophet be used together?
Our sources do not describe an integration between Exaforce and Prophet. Ask both vendors before planning to run them together.