Side by side
Conifers CognitiveSOC vs Torq AI SOC Platform: facts side by side
The short answer
Both Conifers and Torq are AI SOC analyst products. Both replace SOAR. Conifers documents approval or sign-off before actions, a multi-tenant or MSSP offering and on-premises, hybrid or customer-tenant hosting that Torq does not describe. We do not name a winner: which fits depends on your team, and the fit finder can order them by your answers.
By The Triage Desk · AI Cyber Compare · Published 2026-10-08
Desk research from public vendor pages: vendor facts read September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial reading of what vendors publish; we did not run the products and did not interview vendors.
How do Conifers and Torq differ at a glance?
| Fact | Conifers | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Primary model | AI SOC analyst | AI SOC analyst |
| Also reaches into | None | SOAR |
| Position on SOAR | Replaces SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | 90+ (homepage). A May 2026 release said 60+. | 300 pre-built integrations and 4,000+ pre-built steps, plus AI-generated integrations. |
| Deployment | SaaS on Conifers-hosted Azure, or private cloud in the customer's own Azure tenant; processing in the customer's chosen Azure region. Data regions: North America, Europe and, since July 2026, Singapore. | Described as cloud-native. Other options: not described on the pages reviewed. |
| Pricing | Not published | Not published |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, ISO 42001:2023 and German BSI C5 (the last two announced 5 December 2025). |
| Funding | Not in our sources | $70M Series C (September 2024); $140M Series D at a $1.2B valuation (January 2026). Acquired Jit (May 2026). |
Who carries each stage?
Conifers CognitiveSOC
Torq AI SOC Platform
- Your analysts
- Rules you write
- AI agent
- Provider's analysts
- Shared
- Not described
They match on every stage.
Which capabilities does each document?
| Capability | Conifers | Torq | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approval or sign-off before actions | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Multi-tenant or MSSP offering | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| On-premises, hybrid or your own cloud tenant | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Data residency option | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Runs response actions itself | Documented | Documented | |
| Can act alone on some cases | Documented | Documented | |
| Translates existing SOAR playbooks | Not described | Not described | |
| Optional service where the vendor's people work the queue | Not described | Not described | |
| Single-tenant option | Not described | Not described | |
| Integration count published | Documented | Documented | |
| Pricing unit or tiers published | Not described | Not described |
What are the strengths and limits of each?
Conifers
Strengths
- Customer-tenant deployment on Azure with regional data processing, now including Singapore.
- Built multi-tenant for MSSPs from the start.
Limits
- Pricing is not published.
- Hosting is Azure only, and no SOAR playbook translation is described.
Torq
Strengths
- The largest published integration catalog among the AI SOC platforms here, with deterministic and agentic workflows in one engine.
- Heavily funded, with a steady 2026 release record (Agentic Builder, Jit, SOC Brain).
Limits
- Existing SOAR playbooks are rebuilt in Torq rather than translated; plan the rebuild effort.
- No public pricing, and deployment beyond cloud-native is not described.
When would you choose Conifers, and when Torq?
Choose Conifers if you need:
- approval or sign-off before actions
- a multi-tenant or MSSP offering
- on-premises, hybrid or customer-tenant hosting
- Customer-tenant deployment on Azure with regional data processing, now including Singapore.
Choose Torq if you need:
- The largest published integration catalog among the AI SOC platforms here, with deterministic and agentic workflows in one engine.
- Heavily funded, with a steady 2026 release record (Agentic Builder, Jit, SOC Brain).
What does each vendor say about its own results?
Conifers
No vendor figures were collected for Conifers.
Torq
Asked often about this page
Which is better, Conifers or Torq?
We do not rank vendors. Conifers documents approval or sign-off before actions and Torq documents the largest published integration catalog among the AI SOC platforms here, with deterministic and agentic workflows in one engine. The fit finder orders vendors by the needs your answers imply.
Do Conifers and Torq publish pricing?
Neither publishes pricing on its own site.
Can Conifers and Torq be used together?
Our sources do not describe an integration between Conifers and Torq. Ask both vendors before planning to run them together.
Read next
Fit finderOrder vendors by the needs your answers imply.Which modelThe decision guide for all four models.Conifers profileAn agentic AI SOC platform built multi-tenant for MSSPs, deployable in a customer's own Azure tenant.Torq profileAgentic AI on top of Hyperautomation: AI agents for triage and investigation plus a no-code automation engine.