Skip to content
AI Cyber Compare

Side by side

Artemis Security vs Torq AI SOC Platform: facts side by side

The short answer

Both Artemis and Torq are AI SOC analyst products. Both replace SOAR. Artemis documents approval or sign-off before actions and an optional service where its own people work the queue that Torq does not describe. We do not name a winner: which fits depends on your team, and the fit finder can order them by your answers.

By The Triage Desk · AI Cyber Compare · Published 2026-10-08

Desk research from public vendor pages: vendor facts read September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial reading of what vendors publish; we did not run the products and did not interview vendors.

How do Artemis and Torq differ at a glance?

FactArtemisTorq
Primary modelAI SOC analystAI SOC analyst
Also reaches intoSOARMDRSOAR
Position on SOARReplaces SOARReplaces SOAR
Integrations240+ connectors (Artemis states), including Splunk, Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, CrowdStrike NG-SIEM, Snowflake, AWS Athena, BigQuery, Entra ID, Okta, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and Defender XDR.300 pre-built integrations and 4,000+ pre-built steps, plus AI-generated integrations.
DeploymentHot-path data ingested, high-volume data queried where it lives; on-premises execution of response actions described. Tenancy and residency: not described.Described as cloud-native. Other options: not described on the pages reviewed.
PricingNot publishedNot published
ComplianceNot reviewedSOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001, ISO 42001:2023 and German BSI C5 (the last two announced 5 December 2025).
Funding$70M in seed and Series A funding at launch (15 April 2026); Series A led by Felicis.$70M Series C (September 2024); $140M Series D at a $1.2B valuation (January 2026). Acquired Jit (May 2026).

Who carries each stage?

Artemis Security

Work strip for Artemis Security: Triage, AI agent; Investigate, AI agent; Respond, shared; Tune, shared; Nights and weekends, provider's analysts.TriageAI agentInvestigateAI agentRespondSharedTuneSharedNights and weekendsProvider's analysts

Torq AI SOC Platform

Work strip for Torq AI SOC Platform: Triage, AI agent; Investigate, AI agent; Respond, shared; Tune, shared; Nights and weekends, not described.TriageAI agentInvestigateAI agentRespondSharedTuneSharedNights and weekendsNot described
  • Your analysts
  • Rules you write
  • AI agent
  • Provider's analysts
  • Shared
  • Not described

Stages where they differ:

  • Nights and weekends: Artemis provider's analysts, Torq not described

Which capabilities does each document?

CapabilityArtemisTorqDifference
Approval or sign-off before actionsDocumentedNot describedDiffers
Optional service where the vendor's people work the queueDocumentedNot describedDiffers
Runs response actions itselfDocumentedDocumented
Can act alone on some casesDocumentedDocumented
Translates existing SOAR playbooksNot describedNot described
Multi-tenant or MSSP offeringNot describedNot described
On-premises, hybrid or your own cloud tenantNot describedNot described
Single-tenant optionNot describedNot described
Data residency optionNot describedNot described
Integration count publishedDocumentedDocumented
Pricing unit or tiers publishedNot describedNot described

What are the strengths and limits of each?

Artemis

Strengths

  • Approval set per action and per connector, with impact previews before containment.
  • 240+ connectors (Artemis states), with high-volume data queried where it lives.

Limits

  • No public pricing.
  • Out of stealth only since April 2026; tenancy and residency options are not described.

Torq

Strengths

  • The largest published integration catalog among the AI SOC platforms here, with deterministic and agentic workflows in one engine.
  • Heavily funded, with a steady 2026 release record (Agentic Builder, Jit, SOC Brain).

Limits

  • Existing SOAR playbooks are rebuilt in Torq rather than translated; plan the rebuild effort.
  • No public pricing, and deployment beyond cloud-native is not described.

When would you choose Artemis, and when Torq?

Choose Artemis if you need:

  • approval or sign-off before actions
  • an optional service where its own people work the queue
  • Approval set per action and per connector, with impact previews before containment.

Choose Torq if you need:

  • The largest published integration catalog among the AI SOC platforms here, with deterministic and agentic workflows in one engine.
  • Heavily funded, with a steady 2026 release record (Agentic Builder, Jit, SOC Brain).

What does each vendor say about its own results?

Artemis

Torq

Asked often about this page

Which is better, Artemis or Torq?

We do not rank vendors. Artemis documents approval or sign-off before actions and Torq documents the largest published integration catalog among the AI SOC platforms here, with deterministic and agentic workflows in one engine. The fit finder orders vendors by the needs your answers imply.

Do Artemis and Torq publish pricing?

Neither publishes pricing on its own site.

Can Artemis and Torq be used together?

Our sources do not describe an integration between Artemis and Torq. Ask both vendors before planning to run them together.

Read next

Fit finderOrder vendors by the needs your answers imply.Which modelThe decision guide for all four models.Artemis profileAn AI-native security operations platform that detects, investigates and stops attacks, with 300+ response actions behind per-action approval.Torq profileAgentic AI on top of Hyperautomation: AI agents for triage and investigation plus a no-code automation engine.