Side by side
Artemis Security vs Tines: facts side by side
The short answer
Artemis is an AI SOC analyst product and Tines is a SOAR product. Both replace SOAR. Artemis documents an optional service where its own people work the queue and a published integration count; Tines documents on-premises, hybrid or customer-tenant hosting and a published pricing unit or tiers. We do not name a winner: which fits depends on your team, and the fit finder can order them by your answers.
By The Triage Desk · AI Cyber Compare · Published 2026-10-08
Desk research from public vendor pages: vendor facts read September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial reading of what vendors publish; we did not run the products and did not interview vendors.
How do Artemis and Tines differ at a glance?
| Fact | Artemis | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Primary model | AI SOC analyst | SOAR |
| Also reaches into | SOARMDR | AI SOC analyst |
| Position on SOAR | Replaces SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | 240+ connectors (Artemis states), including Splunk, Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, CrowdStrike NG-SIEM, Snowflake, AWS Athena, BigQuery, Entra ID, Okta, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and Defender XDR. | Not published |
| Deployment | Hot-path data ingested, high-volume data queried where it lives; on-premises execution of response actions described. Tenancy and residency: not described. | Shared stack, self-hosted or hybrid; Tines says AI features are available wherever Tines is deployed. |
| Pricing | Not published | Free edition: unlimited users and connectors, 3 live workflows, one-time $50 AI allowance. Paid editions: contact sales; startup program discounts. |
| Compliance | Not reviewed | Not reviewed |
| Funding | $70M in seed and Series A funding at launch (15 April 2026); Series A led by Felicis. | $125M Series C at a $1.125B valuation, announced 11 February 2025. |
Who carries each stage?
Artemis Security
Tines
- Your analysts
- Rules you write
- AI agent
- Provider's analysts
- Shared
- Not described
Stages where they differ:
- Investigate: Artemis AI agent, Tines shared
- Tune: Artemis shared, Tines your analysts
- Nights and weekends: Artemis provider's analysts, Tines not described
Which capabilities does each document?
| Capability | Artemis | Tines | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optional service where the vendor's people work the queue | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| On-premises, hybrid or your own cloud tenant | Not described | Documented | Differs |
| Integration count published | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Pricing unit or tiers published | Not described | Documented | Differs |
| Runs response actions itself | Documented | Documented | |
| Approval or sign-off before actions | Documented | Documented | |
| Can act alone on some cases | Documented | Documented | |
| Translates existing SOAR playbooks | Not described | Not described | |
| Multi-tenant or MSSP offering | Not described | Not described | |
| Single-tenant option | Not described | Not described | |
| Data residency option | Not described | Not described |
What are the strengths and limits of each?
Artemis
Strengths
- Approval set per action and per connector, with impact previews before containment.
- 240+ connectors (Artemis states), with high-volume data queried where it lives.
Limits
- No public pricing.
- Out of stealth only since April 2026; tenancy and residency options are not described.
Tines
Strengths
- Self-hosted and hybrid deployment, with AI available wherever Tines runs.
- A free edition with published limits, so a team can build before talking to sales.
Limits
- No prebuilt AI SOC analyst is described; your team designs the investigation logic.
- No integration count, and paid editions have no public price.
When would you choose Artemis, and when Tines?
Choose Artemis if you need:
- an optional service where its own people work the queue
- a published integration count
- Approval set per action and per connector, with impact previews before containment.
Choose Tines if you need:
- on-premises, hybrid or customer-tenant hosting
- a published pricing unit or tiers
- Self-hosted and hybrid deployment, with AI available wherever Tines runs.
What does each vendor say about its own results?
Artemis
Tines
No vendor figures were collected for Tines.
Asked often about this page
Which is better, Artemis or Tines?
We do not rank vendors. Artemis documents an optional service where its own people work the queue and Tines documents on-premises, hybrid or customer-tenant hosting. The fit finder orders vendors by the needs your answers imply.
Do Artemis and Tines publish pricing?
Tines publishes tiers or a pricing unit; Artemis does not publish pricing on its own site. Neither publishes a paid list price there.
Can Artemis and Tines be used together?
Our sources do not describe an integration between Artemis and Tines. Ask both vendors before planning to run them together.
Read next
Fit finderOrder vendors by the needs your answers imply.Which modelThe decision guide for all four models.Artemis profileAn AI-native security operations platform that detects, investigates and stops attacks, with 300+ response actions behind per-action approval.Tines profileA workflow platform for AI agents, apps and automation that positions itself as a modern SOAR, with an AI SOC use case built from workflows.