Side by side
Artemis Security vs Prophet Security: facts side by side
The short answer
By The Triage Desk · AI Cyber Compare · Published 2026-10-08
Desk research from public vendor pages: vendor facts read September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial reading of what vendors publish; we did not run the products and did not interview vendors.
How do Artemis and Prophet differ at a glance?
| Fact | Artemis | Prophet |
|---|---|---|
| Primary model | AI SOC analyst | AI SOC analyst |
| Also reaches into | SOARMDR | MDR |
| Position on SOAR | Replaces SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | 240+ connectors (Artemis states), including Splunk, Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, CrowdStrike NG-SIEM, Snowflake, AWS Athena, BigQuery, Entra ID, Okta, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and Defender XDR. | 200+ out of the box. |
| Deployment | Hot-path data ingested, high-volume data queried where it lives; on-premises execution of response actions described. Tenancy and residency: not described. | Single-tenant; customer data in individual datastores; bring-your-own-key option; runs on AWS. On-premises: not described. |
| Pricing | Not published | Not published |
| Compliance | Not reviewed | SOC 2 Type II (report on request) |
| Funding | $70M in seed and Series A funding at launch (15 April 2026); Series A led by Felicis. | Not in our sources |
Who carries each stage?
Artemis Security
Prophet Security
- Your analysts
- Rules you write
- AI agent
- Provider's analysts
- Shared
- Not described
They match on every stage.
Which capabilities does each document?
| Capability | Artemis | Prophet | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-tenant option | Not described | Documented | Differs |
| Runs response actions itself | Documented | Documented | |
| Approval or sign-off before actions | Documented | Documented | |
| Can act alone on some cases | Documented | Documented | |
| Translates existing SOAR playbooks | Not described | Not described | |
| Optional service where the vendor's people work the queue | Documented | Documented | |
| Multi-tenant or MSSP offering | Not described | Not described | |
| On-premises, hybrid or your own cloud tenant | Not described | Not described | |
| Data residency option | Not described | Not described | |
| Integration count published | Documented | Documented | |
| Pricing unit or tiers published | Not described | Not described |
What are the strengths and limits of each?
Artemis
Strengths
- Approval set per action and per connector, with impact previews before containment.
- 240+ connectors (Artemis states), with high-volume data queried where it lives.
Limits
- No public pricing.
- Out of stealth only since April 2026; tenancy and residency options are not described.
Prophet
Strengths
- Native, scoped response with a sign-off option, so response does not depend on a SOAR.
- An optional human service for teams without 24x7 staff, plus single-tenant hosting with BYOK.
Limits
- Pricing is not published.
- No path for translating existing SOAR playbooks is described, and hosting is AWS only on the pages reviewed.
When would you choose Artemis, and when Prophet?
Choose Artemis if you need:
- Approval set per action and per connector, with impact previews before containment.
- 240+ connectors (Artemis states), with high-volume data queried where it lives.
Choose Prophet if you need:
- a single-tenant option
- Native, scoped response with a sign-off option, so response does not depend on a SOAR.
What does each vendor say about its own results?
Artemis
Prophet
No vendor figures were collected for Prophet.
Asked often about this page
Which is better, Artemis or Prophet?
We do not rank vendors. Artemis documents approval set per action and per connector, with impact previews before containment and Prophet documents a single-tenant option. The fit finder orders vendors by the needs your answers imply.
Do Artemis and Prophet publish pricing?
Neither publishes pricing on its own site.
Can Artemis and Prophet be used together?
Our sources do not describe an integration between Artemis and Prophet. Ask both vendors before planning to run them together.