Side by side
Artemis Security vs Mate Security: facts side by side
The short answer
Both Artemis and Mate are AI SOC analyst products. Both replace SOAR. Artemis documents an optional service where its own people work the queue and a published integration count; Mate documents translating existing SOAR playbooks. We do not name a winner: which fits depends on your team, and the fit finder can order them by your answers.
By The Triage Desk · AI Cyber Compare · Published 2026-10-08
Desk research from public vendor pages: vendor facts read September 2026, updated 2026-10-13. Editorial reading of what vendors publish; we did not run the products and did not interview vendors.
How do Artemis and Mate differ at a glance?
| Fact | Artemis | Mate |
|---|---|---|
| Primary model | AI SOC analyst | AI SOC analyst |
| Also reaches into | SOARMDR | None |
| Position on SOAR | Replaces SOAR | Replaces SOAR |
| Integrations | 240+ connectors (Artemis states), including Splunk, Splunk SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, CrowdStrike NG-SIEM, Snowflake, AWS Athena, BigQuery, Entra ID, Okta, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and Defender XDR. | Not published |
| Deployment | Hot-path data ingested, high-volume data queried where it lives; on-premises execution of response actions described. Tenancy and residency: not described. | Mate says it is built on AWS infrastructure and sells through AWS Marketplace. Its trust center lists Google Cloud and Amazon Web Services as cloud subprocessors. Self-hosted, customer-tenant or data residency options: not described. |
| Pricing | Not published | Not published |
| Compliance | Not reviewed | ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, CCPA and GDPR, per its trust center, which also lists a SOC 2 Type 2 report, a HIPAA completion letter, an ISO 27001 certificate, a 2026 pentest report and a disaster recovery drill report. |
| Funding | $70M in seed and Series A funding at launch (15 April 2026); Series A led by Felicis. | $15.5M seed (November 2025) and a $35M Series A (July 2026), per Mate's newsroom; investors listed: Canaan, Team8, Insight Partners, M12. |
Who carries each stage?
Artemis Security
Mate Security
- Your analysts
- Rules you write
- AI agent
- Provider's analysts
- Shared
- Not described
Stages where they differ:
- Nights and weekends: Artemis provider's analysts, Mate not described
Which capabilities does each document?
| Capability | Artemis | Mate | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Translates existing SOAR playbooks | Not described | Documented | Differs |
| Optional service where the vendor's people work the queue | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Integration count published | Documented | Not described | Differs |
| Runs response actions itself | Documented | Documented | |
| Approval or sign-off before actions | Documented | Documented | |
| Can act alone on some cases | Documented | Documented | |
| Multi-tenant or MSSP offering | Not described | Not described | |
| On-premises, hybrid or your own cloud tenant | Not described | Not described | |
| Single-tenant option | Not described | Not described | |
| Data residency option | Not described | Not described | |
| Pricing unit or tiers published | Not described | Not described |
What are the strengths and limits of each?
Artemis
Strengths
- Approval set per action and per connector, with impact previews before containment.
- 240+ connectors (Artemis states), with high-volume data queried where it lives.
Limits
- No public pricing.
- Out of stealth only since April 2026; tenancy and residency options are not described.
Mate
Strengths
- The only vendor here whose public pages describe translating existing SOAR playbooks into its own format rather than rebuilding them.
- Graduated autonomy in three named levels, with guardrails and actions scored on confidence, precision and reversibility and enforced outside the agent loop.
- Investigations grounded in a context graph of memories and decision traces from your own team.
Limits
- No pricing unit is published; AWS Marketplace lists one Enterprise tier.
- No integration count is published; confirm your SIEM, EDR and ticketing tools are covered.
When would you choose Artemis, and when Mate?
Choose Artemis if you need:
- an optional service where its own people work the queue
- a published integration count
- Approval set per action and per connector, with impact previews before containment.
Choose Mate if you need:
- translating existing SOAR playbooks
- The only vendor here whose public pages describe translating existing SOAR playbooks into its own format rather than rebuilding them.
What does each vendor say about its own results?
Artemis
Mate
Asked often about this page
Which is better, Artemis or Mate?
We do not rank vendors. Artemis documents an optional service where its own people work the queue and Mate documents translating existing SOAR playbooks. The fit finder orders vendors by the needs your answers imply.
Do Artemis and Mate publish pricing?
Neither publishes pricing on its own site.
Can Artemis and Mate be used together?
Our sources do not describe an integration between Artemis and Mate. Ask both vendors before planning to run them together.
Read next
Fit finderOrder vendors by the needs your answers imply.Which modelThe decision guide for all four models.Artemis profileAn AI-native security operations platform that detects, investigates and stops attacks, with 300+ response actions behind per-action approval.Mate profileMate is the AI SOC platform built on a home-grown security context graph, running continuous detection / continuous response (CD/CR) and replacing SOAR by translating playbooks into Gamebooks.